Biden’s Racist Remark Sparks Controversy, White House Tweaks Official Record!

biden with hands over mouth

In a recent statement that is sparking controversy and debate, President Joe Biden made remarks during a discussion on “Bidenomics,” which included a peculiar comment about Governor Wes Moore’s biceps. However, the most contentious part of his speech came when he touched on his administration’s track record with minority communities. This incident has reignited discussions about Biden’s history of comments on race and transparency in the White House.

The story first emerged on Red State, drawing attention to what they describe as a racist comment made by President Biden during his speech. He stated, “We not only recovered all the jobs we lost during the pandemic, we’ve added millions more. We’ve seen record lows in unemployment, particularly — and I’ve focused on this my whole career — particularly for African Americans and Hispanic workers and veterans, you know, the workers without high-school diplomas.”

The comments quickly went viral, gaining over 3.3 million views, although they received relatively little coverage from mainstream liberal media outlets. This lack of coverage raised questions about the media’s role in holding public officials accountable for their statements.

Even more contentious, however, was the alleged attempt by the White House to modify the transcript of Biden’s remarks. Red State accused the White House of attempting to “clean up” the President’s statement by adding an “and” to the sentence without any indication that this alteration had been made.

The original statement, as reported by Red State, read: “We’ve seen record lows in unemployment, particularly — and I’ve focused on this my whole career — particularly for African Americans and Hispanic workers and veterans, you know, the workers without high-school diplomas.” However, the transcript provided by the White House read: “We’ve seen record lows in unemployment, particularly — and I’ve focused on this my whole career — particularly for African Americans and Hispanic workers and veterans, and you know, the workers without high-school diplomas.”

This change in wording significantly altered the context of Biden’s statement, leading to accusations of dishonesty and an attempt to downplay the controversy.

Critics argue that transcripts are meant to serve as a historical record of what was said by public figures and should not be altered to present a different narrative. When public figures make errors in their statements, the accepted practice is to publish the original statement with an edit note, clearly indicating the correction. This transparency allows the public to see both what was said and the correction that was made.

In this case, the lack of such an edit note raised concerns that the White House was attempting to conceal the President’s alleged mistake. Critics suggested that this omission indicated an unwillingness to address the controversy head-on and a desire to pretend that the incident did not occur.

The debate over the transparency and integrity of the White House transcript system is not new. Critics have argued that the Biden administration, like previous administrations, may selectively edit transcripts to present a more favorable image of the President.

This incident also reignited discussions about President Biden’s history of comments on race. Throughout his long political career, Biden has faced criticism for remarks that have been interpreted as racially insensitive or inappropriate. Critics argue that this latest comment is part of a pattern and raises questions about his understanding of racial issues and his ability to address them effectively.

As the controversy continues to simmer, it remains to be seen whether the White House will address the transcript issue and clarify the President’s intended statement. Additionally, this incident serves as a reminder of the challenges faced by the media in holding public officials accountable for their statements, particularly when it comes to sensitive topics like race. It also highlights the ongoing debate over transparency in government and the role of transcripts in preserving an accurate historical record of public statements.

What do you think? Comment below!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *